A personal and you may basically romantic relationship that’s without gender
Getting a single phrase – voluntagamus form actually options-single for iamnaughty bezplatnГЎ zkuЕЎebnГ verze the Latin. But I question whether you might actually ever have fun with a personally created keyword.
Incorporating a new answer to address the new variety of the fresh new matter (money an expression, rather than wanting a current that):
Are you searching for “marriage-free”, following the style out-of “child-free”? (I know that not most of the relationships end in relationships, however, “relationship-free” is too vague IMO. In my opinion “marriage-free” manage obtain the tip across the nevertheless.)
BTW, “child-free” has not cong options for “no kids wouldn’t like ’em” it’s farther together than anything else, and that appears to be in identical standard place.
You to you can easily phrase is actually “nonogamist”, shaped regarding “nonogamy” in the sense because “bigamist” is created out-of “bigamy”, otherwise “monogamist” out-of “monogamy”.
Because indexed in the -ist entryway when you look at the wiktionary, suffix “-ist” would be “added to conditions to create nouns denoting . individual who comes after an idea or program out-of religion.” Since “nonogamy” identifies perhaps not ist und bleibt” is somebody who determines never to wed.
Maybe “philononogamist”, that really isn’t very difficult to state just after about 14 seeks, carry out serve. Plus, note that those who work in the fresh new “nonogamy.livejournal community” can use “nonogamist” to imply virtually what is actually spelled call at this new posting, but their use can vary away from more common usage.
The bill from the respond to treats off “nonogamy”, in order to demonstrate that although it apparently is not a simple dictionary word, it is a term that’s used regarding the English code.
To have a mature use of “nonogamy”, comprehend the Melbourne Punch publication, webpage 42, 9 Feb 1871, reprinted for the Mr. Punch right here, 1982. Unfortuitously the writer of this item blogged Part XV when you look at the a great types of summation form, instead of in the complete phrases; so you’re able to laughter: “Children felt out-of different perspectives. . Expediency of not having any. . King Herod’s system mentioned approvingly. . This new author’s thoughts. Spouses. Polygamy, monogamy, nonogamy. Nonogamy needed. Objections towards polygamy. . Monogamy unhesitatingly condemned. New views of various age groups plus one sex dead up against it.” (Ellipses exploit.) It seems within this context you to definitely nonogamy function not hitched.
nonogamy.livejournal says, “Which [nonogamy] area is for those who are you to definitely roll our vision whenever i tune in to dating reports. Those who are that don’t feel we have to feel coordinated off to getting delighted. We don’t Hate like, but i do dislike those people that wouldn’t shut up about this currently. Nonogamy ensures that do not you want like, gender,cuddling, schedules, otherwise valentine’s day cards. Like is perhaps all well and a great, but end hold inside currently.”
Specific ignorati from the democraticunderground laugh the definition of, in place of giving it correct obeisance, in the a thread named “Midthread quiz: Do “nonogamy” imply no wives, nine spouses, otherwise wives that do “no-no”s?”.
Urbandictionary also offers a few possibly-ironic meanings out-of nonogamy somewhat on potential which have definitions more than: 1. 2. A beneficial sarcastic regard to progressive monogamy from the set-up community where gender was marginalized otherwise vanishes from inside the a wedding [. ]
Observe that “nonogamist” accordingly solutions the first matter asked, on the “someone who [sic] have knowingly chose to stay solitary for lifetime”, it is perhaps not appropriate when it comes to “relationships” mentioned from the inform
I am frightened you won’t pick an already dependent word with all of the newest connotations and you may definitions you’re looking for. I think celibate ‘s the closest, because it is the sole single-word-title that always contains the connotation of preference. The fresh new downside to it is their unavoidable reference to religion, and that i perceive that you’re not interested in one to connotation. So it fits towards basic three of your criteria.
Comentários