21. Ott MA ainsi que al., The newest trading-regarding anywhere between hormone contraceptives and condoms certainly one of teenagers, Viewpoints to the Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2002, 34(1):6–fourteen.
22. Wilson EK and you may Koo Hp, Connectivity ranging from reduced-money ladies’ relationship features as well as their contraceptive have fun with, Viewpoints into Sexual and you may Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC mais aussi al., Family relations and buddy intimacy so you can adolescent sexual partners in relationship to condom fool around with, Log away from Teenage Fitness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA ainsi que al., Brand new developmental connection out-of dating high quality, hormones birth prevention solutions and you may condom low-use one of teenage feminine, Log off Teenage Wellness, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
25. Umphrey L and you can Sherblom J, Relational partnership and you can dangers to help you relationship repair needs: impacts to your condom have fun with, Journal out of American University Wellness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
twenty-seven. Manning WD ainsi que al., Young adult relationships relationships and also the handling of sexual chance, People Search and Policy Feedback, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
twenty-eight. Manlove J ainsi que al., Teenager moms and dads when you look at the foster care and attention: exposure factors and results for teens and their college students, Look Short term, Arizona, DC: Youngster Styles, 2011.
30. DiClemente RJ ainsi que al., Sexual exposure behaviors on the having elderly sex couples: an examination of black adolescent females, Sexually Transmitted Problems 2002, 29(1):20–24.
32. Fortenberry JD mais aussi al., Condom fool around with while the a purpose of amount of time in the fresh new and you will created adolescent sexual relationships, Western Record of Personal Wellness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and Franzetta K, Chance and defensive circumstances in the changeover to a first sexual reference to a mature partner, Log from Adolescent Wellness, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you can Franzetta K, Birth-control fool around with habits all over teens’ sexual relationship, paper shown in the yearly fulfilling of your own Society Organization from America, Philadelphia, .
35. Manning WD, Giordano Pc and you may Longmore MA, Linking: the connection contexts from “nonrelationship” sex, Journal of Teenage Lookup, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
thirty six. Carlson MJ and you can Furstenberg FF, Jr, The results away from multi-partnered fertility for parental resources and dating, report exhibited during the yearly fulfilling of your Association to have Societal Coverage Investigation and you may Government, Arizona, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and you may Graefe DR, Seeking a mate? The relationship and cohabitation records of unwed parents, in: Wu LL and Wolfe B, eds., Regarding Wedlock: Explanations and Consequences off Nonmarital Virility, New york: Russell Sage Foundation, 2001, pp. 317–343.
forty. Kirby D, Emerging Answers 2007: Lookup Findings on Applications to attenuate Adolescent Maternity and you can Sexually Sent Diseases, Arizona, DC: National Venture to prevent Adolescent and you can Unplanned Maternity, 2007.
41. Kirby D, Brand new feeling out of applications to improve birth-control use one of adult feminine: a peek at experimental and you can quasi-fresh knowledge, Views to your Sexual and you can Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Associations
Jennifer Manlove was system city manager and you may senior browse scientist, Kate Welti is browse scientist, Elizabeth Wildsmith was elder browse researcher and you can Megan Barry was research analyst, the at Child Style, Bethesda, MD.
Background
In the first studies, that used a neighborhood-city take to away from adolescents into the Kansas, Manning and you may associates nine grouped relationships qualities with the you to directory from confident characteristics (instance personal self-disclosure, intimate like and you can dating salience) and something directory regarding negative characteristics (for example argument and you will nonexclusivity). They unearthed that highest score for the possibly list was indeed associated with the reduced condom texture. Descriptive analyses including ideal one a combination of higher self-confident and you can large bad score are on the less condom structure.
In for every single bullet, members were questioned “Because the day from history interview, are you presently inside an online dating dating the place you imagine out-of yourself as an element of a few?” We felt participants to stay an internet dating dating when they answered yes incase the new spouse try a recently available relationships mate, in place of a spouse, cohabiting lover or former spouse. Same-sex matchmaking relationships and people where respondent got previously cohabited on partner was basically excluded. Total, cuatro,013 participants advertised a current dating relationship throughout the 2002–2005. Of remaining participants, 553 were not regarding the test from inside the series of great interest, 1,876 was in fact cohabiting otherwise hitched, and 2,542 didn’t come with most recent dating matchmaking. Respondents within our shot was indeed aged 18–twenty-six.
Relationships connection is actually predicated on several steps. The initial are good 0–ten level in which respondents rated the likelihood that they and you can the lover might possibly be together from inside the six months. A score away from no conveyed not a way; a great 10 indicated 100% probability. I categorized this likelihood due to the fact reduced (less than six), average (6–9) or highest (10). Into second measure of relationship, we incorporated a varying for whether or not the couples had talked about relationship or cohabitation; answers have been categorized because chatted about none, talked about cohabitation otherwise chatted about matrimony. (Respondents whom stated that have discussed one another cohabitation and relationships was in fact included regarding marriage class.)
Heterogeneous birth prevention effects inside long run relationships may also kissbrides.com snap the site be helpful identify down birth-control texture from inside the expanded adolescent matchmaking, despite greater likelihood of actually ever-accessibility contraceptives. thirty-two, 33 Early in the day studies have translated that it selecting by positing you to definitely couples are willing to occasionally forgo contraception use in more serious dating; thirty-two, 34 yet not, our efficiency recommend that quicker birth control fool around with could be centered for the long-emergency room label relationship described as high dispute minimizing connection.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Florida and you may Pleck JH, The new figure regarding more youthful men’s condom explore during and you may across the relationship, Family unit members Believe Point of views, 1994, 26(6):246–251.
Comentários